Search for: "D. Lamere" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am by Heather Douglas
In the course of the trial judge’s judgment, she commented that: Justice Major writing for the dissent (Lamer C.J., Sopinka J., and Major J.) stated that the appeal should not be decided on questions of racism but instead on how courts decide cases. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The principle was described as follows by Lamer CJ in R v Jones, 1994 CanLII 85 (SCC), [1994] 2 SCR 229 at p 249: Any state action that coerces an individual to furnish evidence against him or herself in a proceeding in which the individual and the state are adversaries violates the principle against self-incrimination. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Répondant à l’objection que ce critère repose sur l’hypothèse que l’on puisse prédire la récidive, alors que la chose est impossible, le juge en chef Lamer, au nom de la cour, dans l’arrêt Morales, souligne que la prévisibilité exacte ne constitue pas une exigence constitutionnelle et qu’il suffit d’établir la probabilité de dangerosité,… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
  This argument just seems to get lamer and lamer each time I see it, lamer than a three-legged mule, lamer than a convention of Elvis impersonators, lamer than the word "lame," which is totally out of style. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:53 am by Administrator
C.A.M. 1996 CanLII 230 (SCC), (1996), 105 C.C.C. (3d) 327, Lamer C.J. commented on this principle and stated, at p. 364, that it is “a sentencing judge’s overriding duty to fashion a ‘just and appropriate’ punishment which is proportional to the overall culpability of the offender. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Comme le législateur exige que la détention soit nécessaire pour la sécurité du public, «elle n’est (donc) pas justifiée si la détention est seulement commode ou avantageuse» (R. c. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Comme le législateur exige que la détention soit nécessaire pour la sécurité du public, «elle n’est (donc) pas justifiée si la détention est seulement commode ou avantageuse» (R. c. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In other news … Protect IP Act: Minorities Who Produce It, Should Get Paid For It — Dorrissa D. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm by Patricia Hughes
Although the parties had agreed that the distinction between natural and adoptive parents in the impugned law was unconstitutional and therefore did not provide the Court with the kind of information it usually required (attracting admonition from then Chief Justice Lamer), the Court nevertheless forged ahead to provide the remedy. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:00 am by Steve Baird
  On a related note, it reminds me of the unintended meanings that can result when critical spacing is omitted, as was the case, between the branded words "LA  MER" to yield LAMER. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:55 am
Indeed, Dickson C.J. and Lamer J found the impugned law in violation of the right to security of the person and that it cannot be saved by meeting the procedural standards of fundamental justice. [read post]
Inclusion and Diversity The other primary driver of corporate Pride initiatives is diversity and inclusion (D&I) efforts. [read post]
Inclusion and Diversity The other primary driver of corporate Pride initiatives is diversity and inclusion (D&I) efforts. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:40 pm
As was stated by Lamer J. in Insurance Corp. of British Columbia v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:22 am by emagraken
While the result is a cumbersome calculation, I see no need to resort to any exceptional construction of the legislation, as discussed by Lamer J., as he then was, in R. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Canada, this value is expressed in the Charter under s. 11(d), as follows, 11. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 9:06 pm
I don't think that any judge in our Supreme Court thinks, well I'll just re-write it the way I'd like to see it. [read post]