Search for: "D. R.C. D." Results 21 - 40 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2018, 6:47 am by MBettman
R.C. 2315.21(D) requires that punitive damages not exceed two times the amount of compensatory damages. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:38 am
The Ohio Supreme Court unanimously answered this question in the affirmative, holding that information that constitutes a trade secret under R.C. 1333.61(D) does not lose its character by being recreated from memory. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by Jeff Gamso
 She'd assaulted someone, spraying him with pepper spray. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:42 am by MBettman
Affinity Medical filed a post-trial motion to have the court apply the cap on noneconomic damages set forth in R.C. 2315.18(B)(2) and the cap on punitive damages in R.C. 2315.21(D) to reduce the jury award. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am by MBettman
That position goes against the plain language of R.C. 2117.06, which requires that all creditors with claims against an estate arising out of a contract shall present their claims in accordance with R.C. 2117.06. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am by MBettman
R.C. 1.49 (Non-exhaustive list for courts’ determination of legislative intent where the statute is ambiguous: (A) The object sought to be attained; (B) The circumstances under which the statute was enacted; (C) The legislative history; (D) The common law or former statutory provisions, including laws upon the same or similar subjects; (E) The consequences of a particular construction; (F) The administrative construction of the statute.) [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by MBettman
R.C. 2315.21 (Punitive or Exemplary Damages)                                                                                (D)(2)(a) Punitive damages shall not be awarded in excess of two times the compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff.) [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm by Joe Koncelik
 However, what clearly is missing from the list of statutes in R.C. 5722.22 is a reference to CERCLA. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
Bode, 2015-Ohio-1519 (“[A]n adjudication of delinquency may not be used to enhance the penalty for a later offense under R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d) when the adjudication carried the possibility of confinement, the adjudication was uncounseled, and there was no effective waiver of the right to counsel. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:44 pm by Joe Koncelik
(H.B. 463 changes to R.C. 5709.87) How to Value the Abatement The act specifies that the beginning point for measuring the increase in value subject to abatement is the beginning of the year in which environmental remedial activities began. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:10 am by Eugene Volokh
., decided Monday) (one paragraph break added): We find the five-year firearm condition/sanction against appellant for a misdemeanor violation of R.C. 2923.15(A) [using a weapon while intoxicated] under these circumstances was unreasonable, overbroad, and an unwarranted implication of his Second Amendment rights. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am by MBettman
This is the conduct that R.C. 955.22(C) and (D) were designed to protect against. [read post]