Search for: "D. R.C. D."
Results 21 - 40
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am
Ohio’s criminal revenge porn statute, R.C. 2917.211, prohibits “revenge pornography” as a form of harassment. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am
Ohio’s criminal revenge porn statute, R.C. 2917.211, prohibits “revenge pornography” as a form of harassment. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:30 am
Neither statute provided led to R.C. 1533.18 or 1533.181, the Ohio statutes for this law. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
” R.C. 4733.16(D). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:34 am
R.C. 4733.16(D). [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 7:48 am
This post was authored by Michele Abatangelo, Jacob D. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:21 am
The court of appeals agreed with the city, but the Ohio Supreme Court sided with Standifer: R.C. 149.43(A)(1)(h) [part of the Ohio public records statute] exempts CLEIR from disclosure as public records, and R.C. 149.43(A)(2) defines "CLEIR" as "any record that pertains to a law enforcement matter of a criminal, quasi-criminal, civil, or administrative nature, but only to the extent that the release of the record would create a high probability of disclosure… [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
Later, the trial court reduced Gibson’s punitive damages under R.C. 2315.21. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
., Cebollada Solanas, A. and Mainar Jaime, R.C., 2021. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 8:35 am
., Slip Opnion No. 2021-Ohio-3445, the Ohio Supreme Court interpreted “final,” within R.C. 3314.08(K)(2)(d), with its ordinary meaning and not a legal term of art. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:13 am
“Because R.C. 109.78(D) and R.C. 2923.122(D)(1)(a) are unambiguous and do not conflict with each other, we must apply both statues as written unless and until the General Assembly directs otherwise by legislative action. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
Accordingly, in the absence of a constitutional challenge, the rules clearly stated in the Code of Civil Procedure are what apply. [21] In Lac d’Amiante, the Court noted that in Quebec, “[t]he fundamental law concerning civil procedure is the law enacted by the National Assembly . [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:33 am
Student D posts on social media a respectful but critical discussion of the erratic classroom behavior of his Chemistry teacher, who has been increasingly departing from the curriculum to deliver diatribes about the federal government. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:55 am
“If we say 109 (R.C. 109.78(D)) doesn’t apply, then do we allow non-law enforcement personnel to carry a weapon, hoping they do the right thing with it? [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
" The order did not define "personal identifying information," but the only statute that defines the phrase, R.C. 2913.49(A), defines it to include a person's "name. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The statute defines "mental distress" as "[a]ny mental illness or condition that involves some temporary substantial incapacity," R.C. 2903.211(D)(2)(a), or that "would normally require psychiatric treatment, psychological treatment, or other mental health services," R.C. 2903.211(D)(2)(b). [read post]
Court Punts on Separation of Powers Issue in Arson Offender Registration Statute. State v. Carlisle.
22 Dec 2020, 5:17 am
The conflict was whether R.C. 2909.15(D)(2)(b), the reduction provision of the Arson Offender Registration Statute, unconstitutionally … Continue reading → The post Court Punts on Separation of Powers Issue in Arson Offender Registration Statute. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am
The trial court had ruled it was valid, a ruling not challenged on appeal, but I’d love to know more about this. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
" The order did not define "personal identifying information," but the only statute that defines the phrase, R.C. 2913.49(A), defines it to include a person's "name. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:36 am
At issue in this case is whether R.C. 2909.15(D)(2)(b) unconstitutionally violates the separation of powers doctrine. [read post]
