Search for: "D.J. Close"
Results 21 - 40
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2019, 5:31 am
In re D.J., 2018-Ohio-569 (2018) (9th Dist.) [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 6:10 am
" Pay close attention to the standard of review. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
He then stated that the following day’s session would be closed, and the commission went into recess. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 8:18 am
The Court of Appeals (Walker, Chin and Keenan [D.J.]) has revived the case. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 8:18 am
The Court says this is a close case, and discovery may show that there were meaningful distinctions among the alleged misconduct by the Asian and white companies. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
Dissent by visiting D.J. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Justice D.J. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 11:42 am
” Id.at *8.Of Note: In this case, it drove the D.J. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:22 am
As Bellamy's guilt was a close call, this factual dispute could have a made a difference at the criminal trial. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
Smith, joined by Judge Berzon and D.J. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:22 am
Plaintiff invites the Court of Appeals to extend the Golden Rule to summations when they address liability, but the Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Raggi and Vilardo [D.J.]) will not do so.Barrella argues that Hardwick’s counsel engaged in “golden rule” argumentation during closing, which asks jurors to place themselves in the position of a party. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:29 am
" The Court of Appeals (Hall and Bolden [D.J.] with Droney in dissent) concludes:While a close question, NYMH because of its history and continuing purpose, through its Department of Pastoral Care, is a “religious group,” and since Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
That is enough to make out a prima facie case, because the timeline cuts it too close for the hospital. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 6:51 am
The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Cabranes and Pauly [D.J.]) disagrees and upholds Pabon's conviction. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:28 am
Citing the ministerial exception, the district court dismissed the case on summary judgment, and the Second Circuit (Sack, Lohier and Woods [D.J.]) affirms.Judge Sack provides a comprehensive overview of the ministerial exception, drawing from Supreme Court and other authorities in noting that the values promoted by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (prohibiting gender and other forms of employment discrimination) clash with the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses of the First… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:33 am
That is not waiver, the Second Circuit (Jacobs, Droney and Stanceu [D.J.]) holds. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
Ochoa is now a lead Ninth case on Taylor overbreadth: worth a close read for your next § 1326(d) statutory challenge. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:33 am
Close enough means no lawsuit. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:36 am
The D.J. complained the sentence was “too much. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:35 am
I have light skin, close to 6 foot, easily angered and computer technology is what I live for. [read post]
