Search for: "D.J. Properties"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Peter D.J. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:45 am
Players:Decision by D.J. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:24 pm
Kaplan, No. 15-30213 (8-29-16)(Ezra, D.J., w/Hawkins & McKeown). [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:46 am
But I can sue the town if it passes a zoning law that affects how I control my property. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:44 am
Cal Senior (and former Chief) D.J. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
Hard fought-appeal by ND Cal CJA Counsel Mary Pougiales, appeal from ND Cal D.J. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
The seller, D.J. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
FILE – Kody Brown, center, poses with his wives, from left, Janelle, Christine, Meri and Robyn in a promotional photo for TLC’s reality TV show, “Sister Wives. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:41 am
Temkin, No. 12-50103 (8-13-15)(Wardlaw with Berzon and Smith, Chief D.J.). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:56 am
The government then copied his hard drive onto DVD's and held onto his personal and professional files for a long time, taking the position that this was government, and not defendant's, property. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
” The complaint further alleges that the fire department “adhered to a ‘don’t go in policy’ for all fires which took place at low-income properties located in the City of Utica. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
What other members of the family have a connection to intellectual property? [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:29 am
Hammond, No. 12-30337 (2-7-14)(Murphy, D.J., with Tallman and Bea). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
” Her pants were tight and that’s ok If she would dance I would D.J. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:41 am
The Court of Appeals (Raggi, Droney and Kaplan [D.J.]) says, "Generally, 'there is no constitutionally protected property interest in prospective government employment,' but a written or verbal communication guaranteeing government employment may, in some circumstances, give rise to a such a property interest." [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:30 am
In D.J., the court held that the statute’s wording necessarily implies that the person giving the warning must have been given express or implied authorization from the principal to exercise authority over the school property. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
No. 4267, 9 E.T.R. (3d) 59, D.J. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:28 pm
This opinion does a nice job of using the recent Jones case to explain this was an invasion of space and property, and also a violation of Katz. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:00 pm
Is this an opinion about firearms and intellectual property? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:28 am
But the Court of Appeals (Winter, Raggi and Rakoff [D.J.]), sees it differently. [read post]
