Search for: "D12"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
In the present case, however, the OD has given very carefully drafted and detailed reasons why the European patent was neither novel (in view of D12) nor inventive (D801 and D3; D801 and D9; D802 and D3; D12 and D801 or D12 and D 802). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
*** Translated from the German ***NB : All provisions refer to the EPC 1973.[10] The [patent proprietor] points out that the Opposition Division (OD) has made a legal error in its application of R 71a(1) when it considered that [the patent proprietor’s] submissions concerning the prior use Elsen were new facts and did not admit them into the proceedings. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:51 am
See D12-01 at 3. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
Also other transcription factors could be used as an immunotherapeutic antigen (D10) and could naturally elicited immune responses in humans (D11 and D12). [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus a combination of D1 and D11 or D12 can be ruled out, even taking account of D16, because of the required overall size.[5.6] Moreover, D13 does not disclose a second glass plate that is bonded to a first glass plate in the form of a laminated glass pane and that comprises an electrically conductive coating on which the electrical means are mounted. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
Document D12 recommends vacuum distillation of Nvinyl 2 pyrrolidone. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
How the break functions can be seen from the schematic drawing D12 and the extracts from the post-published manuals D3 and D7. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
D12-05 at 1-3 (emphasis in original, except in last paragraph where emphasis added). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Thus, in relying on a closest prior art document which had never been discussed with the parties, and which was cited for the first time in the written decision under appeal, the OD’s decision violated the parties’ right to be heard pursuant to A 113(1).[5.4] For the above reasons the Board holds that the OD’s handling of the case constitutes a substantial procedural violation which justifies the remittal of the case to the first instance for further prosecution.[5.5] The decision… [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 11:01 am
On this basis, the board has no reason to doubt the [opponent’s] professional conduct of its process of preparing the samples of documents D12 and D20. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:35 am
He grants you an additional d12 to all your die rolls, and if you are directly following his bidding from the card, you get another d12 to roll! [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The board therefore considers it appropriate to make use of its discretion under Article 13(1) and (3) RPBA to not admit document D12 into the procedure. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present decision Board 3.3.04 had to decide on an application in the field of homeopathic drugs. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
In view of the fact that according to document D12 PEG 400 has a melting point of 4 to 6°C, which was not contested by the respondent, example 3 is also not encompassed by the invention defined by the main request, which requires a hydrophilic low melting polymer having a melting point between 20°C and 90°C. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:34 am
Un nombre sans précédent de recours avait été formé, et l'OEB a mis aujourd'hui en ligne certaines décisions, toutes rendues en août ou septembre 2008 : D6/07, D7/07, D12/07, D13/07, D17/07, D19/07, D22/07, D27/07, D40/07, D43/07, D45/07... [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The same applies to documents D11 (from 1999) and D12 (from 2000) which are equally post-published and refer to the determination of melting points (D11, last paragraph of page 2) and “melting start points” (D12, point 2.3), rather than the determination of the LTC temperature. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Furthermore, the experimental results in post-published documents D11 and D12 did not reflect those of the required test experiments. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
The [opponent] added that the terms “flow” and “spread” and “mortar” and “concrete”, respectively, were not synonyms and that D12 does not describe 12 blows, as in the patent, but 25 drops.The Board cannot follow these arguments because the opposed patent describes that the ultra high performance concretes “conventionally have a spread value of at least 150 mm, […] the spread value being measured by the shock table technique, a… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
If the board considered that a further distinguishing feature resided in the interrogation/analysis being carried out on the concentrated microbial agent, this was also obvious in view of D5 and D12. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:22 pm
Recall that the original SSDI eligibility ban was poorly drafted, see D12-05, and the Commission held in Gary Kluczynski, UI Hearing No. 14400214AP (30 May 2014) that this original ban on receiving unemployment benefits only applied to the week in which SSDI [read post]
