Search for: "DE SIMONE v. UNITED STATES" Results 21 - 40 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court of Appeal Before Jackson, Lloyd Jones and Floyd LJJ, [2013] EWCA Civ 616 (see here), the Home Secretary argued that the decision made Pham de facto stateless (with nationality but denied the protection which should go with it), but not de jure stateless (without nationality under the laws of any state) and therefore it did not make him stateless within the meaning of section 40(4) of the 1981 Act. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:37 pm
He spoke his mind about the one-sidedness of the movement towards IFRS adoption in these United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Some of the pre-argument coverage of the case – including Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Marco Simons in a guest editorial at CNN, and Michael Bobelian at Forbes  – discussed Kiobel in the context of Citizens United and corporate personhood. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Fun with fundamentals, US-styleRight: the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeThe IPKat, still behind with his Christmas reading, has at last had the chance to examine Fundamentals of United States Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patent, Trademark, the second edition of which was published by Kluwer Law International towards the close of 2006. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:00 am by Florian Mueller
The Capitol Forum (with whom I'm connected on social media) has just broken the following news:"Qualcomm: Simons Recused from FTC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
My first column was on “The State of Digitization of United Nations Documents” (June 29, 2010), wherein I bemoaned the lack of a “central hub” for online UN documents and publications. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:48 pm
These are the articles from September: International: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XLIV Concludes with Adoption of Several New Measures, Decisions, and Resolutions United Kingdom: Intellectual Property Office Rules Artificial Intelligence Cannot Patent Inventions Israel: Supreme Court Rules Israeli Courts May Void or Change Choice of Law Provisions in Standard Contracts Between Global Companies and Small Businesses Japan: Children and Family Agency Establishment Act Adopted … [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, is “part of a campaign to use the courts in service of a libertarian rollback of the administrative state. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Richter to preclude de novo review where there was uncontested evidence sufficient to rebut the Richter presumption and both parties agreed that the claims were not adjudicated by the state court. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
  Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]