Search for: "DEAN v. MOORE"
Results 21 - 40
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2007, 1:27 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Carl S. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
S. ___ (2020); Moore v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
Facts: This case (Gillispie v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Should SCOTUS endorse ISL in Moore v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
She was also a litigation associate at Cravath, Swaine and Moore LLP. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
V. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:34 am
The Court’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am
Are the bills constitutional in light of the dreaded independent state legislature (ISL) theory that the Supreme Court might endorse in Moore v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm
I speak here of the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering dispute (Moore v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
President and Fellow of Harvard College – Race-based Affirmative Action Programs Moore v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:19 pm
See Moore v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
Moore v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Her analysis of Bhasin v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:05 am
LEXIS 110393 (SD CA, Sept. 27, 2011), a California federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his claim that refusal to provide him a halal diet violated his free exercise, equal protection and RFRA rights.In Dean v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
As many Verdict readers know, the Supreme Court this term will hear arguments in Moore v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:43 am
Contact Julia Moore at (480) 965-3112 if your files are larger than 2MB. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:12 am
Kenneth Moore, appellant pro se. [read post]
