Search for: "DEF"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
” Order Granting Defs. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Def. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Specialist, Dep’t of Def. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 8:01 am
Specialist, Dep’t of Def. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
Statement to be submitted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, accredited under operative paragraph No. 9 of UN General Assembly Resolution 75/282, on behalf of 124 signatories. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
Editor’s Note: The U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:53 am
Of note, the court in Children’s Health Def. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:37 am
Specialist, Def. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:44 am
Sec’y of Def., 940 F.3d 1310 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
” Def. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:43 pm
Natural Resources Def. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
Def. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 10:12 am
Children’s Health Def. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Def. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 7:25 am
Of course, we got to see EFF supporters in full force when we headed to Las Vegas for the summer security conferences—BSides Las Vegas, Black Hat USA, and DEF CON. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:06 am
In her view, Congress intended to rid the workplace of all discrimination, so efforts to limit claims solely to those disadvantaging an employee would “def[y] its text and history. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) is the seminal Supreme Court case that set forth the requirements for establishing Article III standing – namely that a party must show: An “injury in fact” that is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent (not hypothetical) Causation between the injury and the challenged conduct Redressability (a favorable court decision would likely redress the injury) In Lujan, the Court found the plaintiffs failed… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
Def. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Instead, the state seeks summary reversal, arguing that the 4th Circuit majority “def[ied] this Court’s remand instruction and circumvent[ed] 28 U.S.C. [read post]