Search for: "DICKS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Dick Howard has said it takes about nine years for a “new” Supreme Court’s identity to emerge, and even then there are always surprises. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am by Charon QC
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court in 2008 gave life to the Second Amendment, holding that the right to bear arms prevented the District of Columbia from banning handguns in the home. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
As Natalie Peck reported for Inforrm here, the Inquiry heard from former Times in-house lawyer, Alastair Brett, crime reporters and senior figures from the Metropolitan Police force, including head of press Dick Fedorcio. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 3:17 am by SHG
Supreme Court made its landmark decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 am by Mike Scarcella
Supreme Court's landmark ruling in 2008 that struck down the District of Columbia's ban on handgun ownership. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In this case, Dick Heller (of the Supreme Court’s Heller decision) is challenging the Firearms Registration Amendment Act of 2008 (FRA), a statute adopted by the District of Columbia in response to the Supreme Court’s decision invalidating the District’s prior gun controls. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:28 am by Adam Chandler
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on the litigation that has followed the Court’s decisions striking down handgun bans in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am by David Kravets
Answer: No The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled it could, a decision the justices reversed. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 7:50 pm by Glenn Reynolds
A defense force established under this section may be used within the jurisdiction concerned, as its chief executive (or commanding general in the case of the District of Columbia) considers necessary, but it may not be called, ordered, or drafted into the armed forces. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia has just ruled that the D.C. firearm ordinances enacted after the Supreme Court's D.C. v. [read post]