Search for: "DOE v. SESSIONS et al" Results 21 - 40 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
The 7th Circuit issued an opinion Thursday in Pisciotta et al v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:53 am
Duncan, et al., issued two important ruling regarding dram shop liability. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
MenellPerfect storm: digital age, Napster, increased statutory damages; RIAA et al. ended up targeting individual users. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
He cited subsequent cases that have construed Kiyemba narrowly: Aamer, et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LASALLE, P.J, CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur. 2019-08292 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION N.B.In the Matter of Myrna Bailenson, et al., respondents, v Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., appellants. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Does that make a difference? [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:49 am by Raffaela Wakeman
 Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Langford v. [read post]