Search for: "DOE v. City University of New York et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
In 2007, Christina Romer and David Romer, professors of economics at the University of California Berkeley, conducted a study to determine the impact of legislated tax changes on the economy. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm
Either way, you might like to have some resources handy to help you understand the context of the case.Good Overviews Laurie Sobel et al., Abortion at SCOTUS: Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
New York Civil Liberties Union; New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers; New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al.; New York City Bar Association; New York County Lawyers Association et al.; City of New York; New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae.SINGAS, J. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
New York Civil Liberties Union; New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers; New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al.; New York City Bar Association; New York County Lawyers Association et al.; City of New York; New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae.SINGAS, J. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, United University Professions, Police Benevolent Association of the New York State Troopers, Inc., New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al., Court Attorneys Association of the City of New York et al., New York State Police Investigators Association, Local 4 IUPA,… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, United University Professions, Police Benevolent Association of the New York State Troopers, Inc., New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al., Court Attorneys Association of the City of New York et al., New York State Police Investigators Association, Local 4 IUPA,… [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm
The Commission appears to have based its finding on promising early experiences in a handful of large departments, including Oakland, New York City, and Kansas City. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Sanjour was born in the Bronx, New York City, and is currently in his late eighties. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Circuit Offers Bad News, Good New on Net Neutrality: FCC Repeal Upheld, But States Can Fill the Gap (EFF) Mozilla v FCC EFF Amicus Brief (EFF) California's Net Neutrality Law: What Happened, What's Next (EFF) CA’s Net Neutrality Law Letters of Supporters (EFF) Broad Coalition Urges Court Not to Block California's Net Neutrality Law (EFF) California Net Neutrality Cases - American Cable Association, et al… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
Calling profits normal does not make them normal. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
In City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Federal judges play key roles in the administration of disability policy in cities across the country. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Windy City Innovations, LLC, Nos. 2018-1400 et al. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:07 pm
Section 230 doesn't provide Facebook et al. with an immunity from liability for publishing its users' "hate speech," the Constitution does that, in the First Amendment.*** *** Interestingly, the Times itself rather quickly recognized its error. [read post]
