Search for: "DOES, 1 through 15, individual and official capacity" Results 21 - 40 of 472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Note the image to the right is not Eileen Scofield; rather it depicts a frustrated individual whose level of obvious stress and angst mirrors that of the L-1 stakeholder community.] [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Although the Court held 15 years after deciding Fitzgerald, in Clinton v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Pullara, No. 07-2956 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit alleging improper medical treatment by corrections officials during interstate transport of plaintiff, dismissal of some defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff waived his arguments for personal jurisdiction based on agency theory; 2) section 1983 does not create vicarious or respondeat superior liability; and 3) plaintiff failed to argue that personal jurisdiction… [read post]
We act in our individual capacities; our current and former institutional affiliations are noted for identification purposes only. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 5:08 am by Public Employment Law Press
OMH reported that, from 2014 through State fiscal year 2020-21, more than $82.5 million realized under the plan was allocated to community-based services (CBS), serving more than 111,000 individuals. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 5:08 am by Public Employment Law Press
OMH reported that, from 2014 through State fiscal year 2020-21, more than $82.5 million realized under the plan was allocated to community-based services (CBS), serving more than 111,000 individuals. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This affected Mennonites and Doukhobors, even though the federal government had exempted them officially from military service, the former in 1873 and the latter in 1898. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
Reading Article II through the lens of what I call “democratic constitutionalism,” I propose to resolve many of the Constitution’s ambiguities regarding the separation of powers in ways that advance checks and balances and enhance Congress’s capacities to structure, regulate, and oversee the exercise of executive power. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:05 pm by Coral Beach
As in the past, our year-end coverage is not merely a list of individual stories by individual writers. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
Some states do extend immunity to separate entities that exercise sovereign authority or sovereign power: Japan (art. 2(iii)), Pakistan (art. 15(2)), Singapore (art. 16(2)), South Africa (art. 15(1)), and the United Kingdom (art. 14(2)). [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  For example, more accurate privacy guidance could be stated as “offer notice and choice, except where fairness does not require it, such as when consent can fairly be implied or where the compliance with a warrant affords no choice. [read post]