Search for: "DOES 1-100, exclusive"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 6:31 pm
Co., 100 N.Y.2d 377, 388 (N.Y. 2003). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
Assuming a 5% penalty for the late filing, it would be $100 (5% x $2,000). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:50 am
Cadillac Tax Rate on $100, Tax-Exclusive vs. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:05 pm
NOBLE DRILLING (US) INC; NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATION; NOBLE DRILLING SERVICES INC; JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants-Appellees No. 07-60402 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 2008 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am
Novelty (Article 100(a) and Article 54(1) EPC)Document (1) does not provide a direct and unambiguous disclosure of the feature of intramuscular injection and is thus not novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1.(...)5. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:20 am
NOTE: The following entry features revised content to reflect Public Acts 100-607 and 100-906. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
So it looks like we will have extension law (for 2014 only), assuming the Senate approves the House bill and the President does not veto it. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
The recording of the hearing is available here (morning) and here (afternoon).Statutory frameworkModern patent law is almost entirely a creature of statute’ ([136]; also [100]). [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:14 pm
Subsection (a) Not Exclusive. [read post]
11 May 2022, 6:44 am
Does this mean that Conten [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:10 am
1 Hartford Casualty Ins. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
Code § 25120(f)(2) defines gross receipts to include dividends, and that no applicable exclusion applies to change this result. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:39 am
Co., 234 F.R.D. 99, 100 (E.D. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
See CRPC Rule 1-100 and its implied exclusion of non-lawyers not employed/contracted by lawyers. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm
I hasten to add the views expressed in this blog post are exclusively my own. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:23 pm
Co., 100 NY2d 377, 383). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:45 am
The right of communicating to the public, contained in the Art 3 of the Directive 2001/29, reads: “1. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
However the Enlarged Board of Appeal also held that:"This negative effect does not apply to European patents granted before 1 July 2017 and European patent applications which were filed before that date and are still pending" (ibid).4. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 1:36 pm
The net notional value is calculated as described in CFTC Regulation 4.13(a)(ii)(B)(1) and 4.13(a)(ii)(B)(2). [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
The questions asked of the USPTO, and specifically Director Kappos, related to the USPTO interpretation of the grace period in 102(b)(1)(B). [read post]
