Search for: "DOES Nos. 1-10" Results 21 - 40 of 471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2014, 5:09 am
In re Sports Outdoor And Recreation (SOAR) Park, Serial Nos. 85108918 and 85108928 (February 10, 2014) [not precedential].Click on picture for larger imageThe examining attorney argued that the marks do not appear as source indicators for theme park services. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:51 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from In Re: Application Chevron, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, Nos. 10-4699 and 11-1099, May 25th, 2011: A party invoking the crime-fraud exception in an attempt to vitiate the attorney-client privilege must make a prima facie showing that (1) the client was committing or intending to commit a fraud or crime, and (2) the attorney-client communications were in furtherance of that alleged crime or fraud. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm by Christofer Bates
§ 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(A).In a 2-1 decision, the Court determined that this language supersedes Doe, and that the defendants were eligible for relief. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 11:15 am by Unknown
New Insights on the Recent Refugee Arrivals in Germany and Their Integration Prospects," Soziale Welt, vol. 71, nos. 1-2 (2020) [open access]“In Search of Opportunity and Community: Internal Migration of Refugees in the United States,” Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 32 (Aug. 2020) [free full-text]"Integration of Displaced Syrians in Saudi Arabia," Border Crossing, vol. 10, no. 2 (2020) [open access]Integration Policies, Practices &… [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:11 am
., Serial No. 86556214 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of WHITE SANGRIIIA for "Prepared alcoholic cocktail; Alcoholic beverages except beers" [WHITE and SANGRIA disclaimed].February 8, 2018 - 10 AM: In re i.am.symbolic, llc, Serial No. 85916778 [Section 2(d) refusal of #WILLPOWER for various clothing items, in view of the registered mark shown below, for  clothing and shoes]. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
What does this case have that all three of these attorneys found useful? [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
A method using such combinations of first and second primers does not fall within the scope of granted claim 1. [read post]
6 May 2021, 7:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent Nos. 8,515,867, 8,660,947, 8,762,273, 9,811,817, and 10,115,098. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
§ 4.188(b)(1) places the burden on the contractor of showing no evidence of prior violations. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:33 am by Stanley D. Baum
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan, Nos. 10-15365, 10-15437 (9th Cir. 2011) (Unpublished Memorandum), the plaintiff brought suit under ERISA for disability benefits, retroactive to 1974, against Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan (the "Plan"). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
The judges referred to the Advocate General’s opinion in Coty (case C‑567/18), noting that the term ‘possession’ does not appear in all the language versions of Art. 9(3)(b) EUTMR (the equivalent of Art. 10(3)(b) TMD). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:29 pm by Eric Schweibenz
   Incorporating by reference his indefiniteness findings of Order No. 18, ALJ Bullock granted Nokia’s motion as to invalidity of claims 1-3 and 6-10 of the ‘599 patent. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:44 pm
On March 10, 2009, the European Court of Human Rights held that the British Internet publication rule does not violate the right to free expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]