Search for: "DUKE UNIVERSITY v. UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 1:58 pm
” However, as noted by the Court in Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:38 pm
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals in Dallas said distributor JTW Medical Products Inc. was acting outside the scope of its contract with a health care provider when its president allegedly gave a patient's husband faulty information. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
CESAR MARROQUIN AND OLGA BROWN; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-07-00014-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-29-07)2 petitions08-0069 BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, AND SARA THOMAS, R.N. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
The paper concludes where it started—suggesting the need to expand our understanding of constitutional theory to include communication among systems in a complex polycentric constituting universe. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Duke University, 307 F. 3d 1351, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
ThCourt observed that recently, in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Perhaps Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
“Shrink wrap” licenses for software are a good example, where opening and using the product is a sufficient indication that the purchaser has accepted the terms of use (see ProCD, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
The court found that the V3 product infringes JVW’s patent, while the V4 product does not. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Collins, “A Considerable Surgical Operation”: Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts, Duke Law Journal 60(2):249-343 (2010). [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us
© 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:38 pm
The Southern District of New York, in granting trademark protection to Kryptonite, summed up the policy reason why trademark protection may be granted to a fictional element fo an entertainment property, not yet used in a traditional trademark manner: [W]here the the product sold by plaintiff is “entertainment” in one form or another, then not only the advertising of the product but also an ingredient of the product itself can amount to a… [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
Some production companies have even devoted entire legal departments to this endeavor. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
The conference was hosted by HiiL, the International University College of Turin (IUC) and the Collegio Carlo Alberto. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 369 (2010)Katherine Kaso-Howard, Comment, American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
