Search for: "Daimler AG v. Bauman" Results 21 - 40 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Consider, for example, courts where the employee or new employer are located (including where the new employer is incorporated or maintains its principal place of business, both of which subject the new employer to general personal jurisdiction under Daimler AG v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
.),  handed down on Friday alters the course of personal jurisdiction law in Pennsylvania relative to corporations.In reviewing the history of the law on this issue, the court noted that, in 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Daimler AG v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
 See Magdalena v Lins, 123 AD3d 600, 601 (1st Dept 2014) (citing Daimler AG v Bauman, 571 US 117, 136 (2014)).Plaintiffs assert that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1) because they transacted business within the state and pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(3) because Defendants' tortious actions outside the state allegedly caused injury within the state.I. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2018)Last year I taught a course on Corporate Social Responsibility Law for the very first time (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]