Search for: "Daniel Lopez v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
United States, the court ruled 7-0 (without the participation of Justice Elena Kagan) that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
Daniel Lopez Ortiz was killed when his car was struck by a box truck in April 2009. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Daniels and Yun K. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Stone (1936), ‘The Common Law in the United States’ 5. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCase number: 13-cv-02279 (United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois)Case filed: December 20, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2014 02/24/2014 05/25/2014 2014-17 SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
According to estimates published in a joint statement by the United States, Korea, and Japan, the North Korean regime “stole up to $1.7 billion in cryptocurrency in 2022 alone. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Juno Mother Earth Asset Management, LLC, Eugenio Verzili and Arturo Allan Rodriguez Lopez a/k/a Arturo RodriguezCase number: 11-cv-1778 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: March 15, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 31, 2014 04/22/2014 07/21/2014 2014-43 SEC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:04 pm
Watkins/Proctor & Gamble Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Nicole Porter, The Sentencing Project Panel III: The Criminalization of Immigration Law Since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in INS v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
One example is United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
