Search for: "Danielle Katz"
Results 21 - 40
of 561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2023, 3:25 pm
by Dr. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
Union Avoidance and Organizing: Employer Strategies (Part 2) Video – by Daniel V. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Katz, Cohen & Wolf Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy (CT) – by Stuart M. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm
Corinna Coupette (Max Planck Institute for Informatics), Dirk Hartung (Bucerius Law School - Center for Legal Technology and Data Science; Stanford University - Stanford Codex Center), & Daniel Martin Katz (Illinois Tech - Chicago Kent College of Law; Bucerius Center for Legal Technology & Data Science; Stanford CodeX - The Center for Legal Informatics; 273 Ventures) have posted Legal Hypergraphs on SSRN. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz: Complaint Posted by Leeor Ofer (Harvard Law School), on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Attorneys’ fees, closing agreements, Delaware Court of Chancery, Fiduciary duties, Merger litigation, sale Utilizing Compensation Actually Paid to Evaluate Pay and Performance Posted by Ira T. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz: Complaint Posted by Leeor Ofer (Harvard Law School), on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Attorneys’ fees, closing agreements, Delaware Court of Chancery, Fiduciary duties, Merger litigation, sale Utilizing Compensation Actually Paid to Evaluate Pay and Performance Posted by Ira T. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
Stanwick, Daniel J. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:31 am
Stanwick, Daniel J. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:53 am
Bommarito and his colleague, Daniel Katz were behind GPT-3 and GPT-4 taking the Bar Exam. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
To conceal the hush money payment, it was agreed that Cohen would make the payment to Daniels via a shell company (Essential Consultants), on the agreement that Trump would later reimburse Cohen. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
Evidence was also heard from the private investigators Steve Whittamore and Daniel Portley-Hanks, whose services had been used by MGN. [read post]
12 May 2023, 1:15 pm
In this riveting episode of our podcast, we delve into the fascinating world of AI in the legal industry with our esteemed guests, Nathan Walter and Bridget Albiero. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 10:23 am
Goodson (47 William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review forthcoming) The Major Questions Doctrine at the Boundaries of Interpretive Law by Daniel Walters (Iowa Law Review forthcoming) Becoming the Administrator-in-Chief: Myers and the Progressive Presidency by Andrea Scoseria Katz & Noah A. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:47 am
I spoke next, making arguments that reflected my recent article Katz as Originalism in the Duke Law Journal. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:09 pm
Pablo Arredondo, JD ’05, is a Codex fellow.Casetext’s Chief Innovation Officer and co-founder Pablo Arredondo, JD ’05, who is a Codex fellow, collaborated with Codex-affiliated faculty Daniel Katz and Michael Bommarito to study GPT-4’s performance on the UBE. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
I’d like to thank the members of the SEC staff who worked on this proposal, including: Tyler Raimo, Matt Cursio, David Garcia, Eugene Hsia, Megan Mitchell, Amir Katz, Joanne Kim, Haoxiang Zhu, David Saltiel, Andrea Orr, Eric Juzenas, David Shillman, Geeta Dhingra, Joanne Rutkowski, Jo Anne Swindler, Roni Bergoffen, Yue Ding, Sharon Park, and Marilyn Parker in the Division of Trading and Markets; Jessica Wachter, Paul Barton, Lauren Moore, Charles Woodworth, Zachery Kiefer, Seung Won… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
The need for something like FISA was made clear as early as 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in the famous Keith Case that electronic collection in domestic security cases fell within the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as set forth in Katz v. [read post]
