Search for: "Daniels v. Said" Results 21 - 40 of 1,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column previews next week's Supreme Court oral argument in Jack Daniel's Properties v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” Describing getting ready to leave Trump’s hotel suite, Daniels said the following words twice, verbatim: “My hands were shaking so hard. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
Grimaldi test was too permissive of “expressive works” that cause confusion.[8] Counsel for Jack Daniels advocated elimination of the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
Grimaldi test was too permissive of “expressive works” that cause confusion.[8] Counsel for Jack Daniels advocated elimination of the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
Grimaldi test was too permissive of “expressive works” that cause confusion.[8] Counsel for Jack Daniels advocated elimination of the Rogers v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:27 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Second District, Division Four) said that's not good enough; a plaintiff must provide evidence of the defendant's overall financial condition, including assets and liabilities. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Daniel Schwartz, of the law firm of Shipman and Goodwin, writes the Connecticut Employment Law Blog, long on my reading list. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
  By total coincidence, while the Kat was citing Daniel v Lions at the LIDC Conference, a whole group of Daniels was being cast to the lions the other end of Europe, in the lovely city of Warsaw. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am by Eric Goldman
” The court summarizes (emphasis added): “Daniel’s theory of liability is that, through its design and operation of website features, Armslist’s actions were a cause of the injuries to Daniel. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am by Josh H. Escovedo
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari following an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
"That's bull****," Mr Holder said in a confrontation after a cabinet meeting, according to author Daniel Klaidman. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
If the reason you could file suit in the first place was because your client said X, and yet your client repeatedly -- and after multiple court orders -- refuses to produce X, at some point, it seems to me that you can no longer rely on X. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm
Supreme Court filing: Today in the case captioned Daniel v. [read post]