Search for: "David C Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2008, 9:48 am
An effective leader does not expect perfection. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
The LCFS does not facially (or otherwise) discriminate against out-of-state ethanol or crude oil. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:48 am
What does your firm do to insure that its incoming and upcoming leadership has the soft skills necessary to cope with our challenging legal landscape? [read post]
Humane Society Legislative Fund endorses Rep. Sharice Davids for Kansas’s 3rd Congressional District
19 Jul 2022, 10:47 am
HSLF does not judge candidates based on party affiliation or any other issue. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
By David C. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:29 pm
By David C. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:05 am
By David C. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:47 am
Argument will be heard tomorrow, August 17, at 10 a.m., before Chief Judge Royce C. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:50 pm
By David C. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
Recently, we received word that our attorneys here at the Law Office of David S. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
Last Tuesday, Justice Minister David Lametti tabled his department’s Charter statement for Bill C-18, the Online News Act. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:30 am
One size does not fit all. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm
One of the significant common features of Grosse v Purvis, Doe v ABC and Doe v Yahoo! [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:16 am
How does the small-c Constitution change? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:29 pm
By David C. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:11 pm
By David C. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:16 am
., Attorney, SwedelsonGottlieb Edited by David C. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:05 am
How else to explain that if he is correct that Bill C-11 does not include user content regulation, then the Simons/Miville-Duchêne amendment does not change anything and it should fall into his category of amendments with zero impact and receive approval? [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 7:45 am
David Hill. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:11 am
Just over three years later, the government has introduced a bill that does little for Canadians' privacy, while providing new exceptions for businesses and new powers for law enforcement (David Fraser has helpfully created a redline version of PIPEDA with the proposed changes). [read post]
