Search for: "David Hricik" Results 21 - 40 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2022, 1:37 pm by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Dennis on the main page had written a couple months back about the opinion of Novartis Pharm. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:31 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Ordinarily, a conflict of interest leads to disqualification, but they can lead to fee disgorgement (an attorney is supposed to be loyal, and like any other agent, is not entitled to keep a fee earned while being disloyal) and, on occasion, damages. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Patent Docs
Patent & Trademark Office, David Hricik of Mercer Law School, and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. will provide an overview of the ethical obligations of practice as well as the substantive law of inequitable conduct and related disciplinary matters, including several recent cases finding inequitable conduct despite the barriers created in 2011 by Therasense. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 9:57 pm by Patent Docs
The roster of speakers includes Dennis Crouch, John Duffy, David Hricik, and John White. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:14 am by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School A partner at a major firm had been suspended initially for six months for intentionally over-billing certain clients for 450 hours of work she and other lawyers had not performed. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Adkins”; David Hricik, “Will the Court Correct the Mess that is GS CleanTech Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:48 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School The USPTO is seeking comments on amending certain PTAB Rules of Practice. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm by Patent Docs
William Covey, Deputy General Counsel and Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline for the U.S. patent and Trademark Office; David Hricik, Mercer University School of Law; and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner will review the USPTO rules regarding inequitable conduct; discuss important decisions regarding inequitable conduct since Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:03 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Over on the main page, Dennis has written up GS CleanTech Corp. and Cantor Colburn LLP v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:08 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School An order by Judge Alsup in Oracle Am., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:31 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School The L.A. bar association is the latest to offer an opinion on what to do if someone, say the opposing party’s former employee, offers you information from the opposing party that looks purloined or seems confidential. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 12:11 pm by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School In an order granting motions to disqualify — rather than analyzing with discretion a decision of a district court — the Federal Circuit disqualified Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP (“KM”) from representing parties in appeals styled Dr. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:03 am by David
By David Hricik The ABA Model Rules and most state rules divide the world into “persons represented by counsel,” who may not be contacted about a matter, and “unrepresented persons,” who may. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 4:27 pm by Patent Docs
David Hricik of Mercer University School of Law, Kevin Noonan of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, and Rohit Singla, Munger of Tolles & Olson LLP will assess the significant ongoing impact of the 2017 Federal Circuit decision in Regeneron v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
David Hricik (Patent Law Ethics) has several interesting upcoming events: October 19, 2018 – Hricik is speaking at the 33rd Annual Privacy & Technology Law Institute in Atlanta on “Legal Ethics in the Modern World” October 23, 2018 – Hricik is speaking at the 12th Annual Corporate IP Institute in Atlanta on “How Technology Creates Professionalism Issues” November 1, 2018 – Hricik is speaking at the 23rd Annual… [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:31 am by David
by David Hricik ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 483 (Oct. 17, 2018) is here. [read post]