Search for: "David Marbury"
Results 21 - 40
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
One of the powers the Act gave to the Supreme Court, writs of mandamus, was the subject of the famous Supreme Court case, Marbury v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
David Bernstein argues for skepticism about administrative constitutionalism out of concern that agencies will push constitutional concerns that accord with their missions at the expense of other constitutional rights. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on David S. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
His case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Democrats had harsh words for the president during Robert Mueller’s appearance before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
With the exception of Marbury, almost no case was considered in any depth. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:13 am
” On May 29, David Forte gave a lecture at Cardinal Wyszyński University on “Why Marbury v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Marbury is best known for its invocation and defense of the institution of judicial review—the notion that courts are bound to follow the Constitution even if that means refusing to apply or enforce enactments by Congress and the President. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:18 am
They go on to identify several topics on which they would have questioned Whitaker and on which subjects his answers may reasonably have led members of the Senate to oppose his appointment, including: Whitaker’s public, disparaging comments about the Mueller investigation, especially considering that “a number of Senators have expressed their belief that the Mueller investigation should be allowed to continue without interference”; Whitaker’s stated disagreement with… [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am
And in 1990 David Souter refused to state his position on Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
If neither the executive nor legislative branch of the federal government may unilaterally change the meaning of the Constitution, neither should the judiciary be able to do so.In identifying precedents to support this view, we pointed first to John Marshall’s fountainhead 1803 opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
The trailblazing decision of Marbury v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 7:09 am
Marbury, Brown, NFIB)--though I include one on Lochner--or noteworthy constitutional figures (e.g. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
Should the court go all the way back to Marbury v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Given that, we’re pleased to have the chance to ask you, and now David, the questions for a change. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Attention Scalia, J., biographers: in an anecdote recounted here at 1:23, the director David O. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
” Still, there are always ideological surprises: “Everybody expected [David] Souter to be a moderate conservative, and he turned out to be liberal-leaning. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "The Emerging Normative Structures of Transnational Law: Non-State Enterprises in Polycentric Asymmetric Global Orders," that appears in the B.Y.U. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am
Perhaps, but during his confirmation hearing in 1986, Scalia declined to discuss any cases, famously refusing even to answer questions about Marbury v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
craze: The ‘drunk outlined’ version of the Election of 1800 and Marbury. [read post]
