Search for: "David V. Arnold" Results 21 - 40 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 21 July 2022 the Court of Appeal (Arnold, Dingemans and Warby LJJ) heard the defendant’s appeal in the case of Riley v Murray against the judgment of Nicklin J dated 20 December 2021 ([2021] EWHC 3437 (QB)) in which damages of £10,000 were awarded to the claimant. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
,” History Channel, Jan 31, 2019; David Huyssen, “We won’t get out of the Second Gilded Age the way we got out of the first,” Vox, Apr 1, 2019. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer is quoted, and his article Will Contests—Prediction and Prevention is cited in the following case: Matter of Last Will and Testament of Beard v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
., before going to clerk for Judge David Tatel of the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “In order to succeed on a claim for accounting malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of injury (see KBL, LLP v Community Counseling & Mediation Servs., 123 AD3d 488 [2014]; Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788 [2007]; D.D. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison and Arnold and Sir Nicholas Patten) Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd (Rev 1) [2021] EWCA Civ 854 (11 June 2021)In Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd [2020] EWHC 444 (Pat) (5 March 2020) which I discussed in Patents - Geofabrics Ltd v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Ltd. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
David KaplanHani FarahIn a recent post (here), David Kaplan of the Saxena White P.A. law firm and Lane Arnold, a Senior Director – Legal at the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO), discussed the Catch-22 in which the court’s rulings in the Valeant securities class action opt-out cases had put prospective securities suit opt-outs. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, as discussed in the following guest post from David Kaplan and Lane Arnold, a series of recent developments has significantly complicated the decision-making framework for prospective opt outs. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]