Search for: "Davies v. North Dakota" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am by Joseph Tartakovsky
The state interest in settled rules is evidenced in the decision of 29 states to join Nevada’s brief, from Oregon and Alabama to Delaware and North Dakota. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
South Africa North West Premier Supra Mahumapelo has dismissed reports that he has withdrawn his defamation case against the North West Business Forum. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Attorney General announced the Department of Justice’s commitment to the statute, the South Dakota class action filed by the Oglala Sioux Tribe is currently pending after much drama about whether Judge Davis was refusing to disclose evidence, and DOJ intervened as an amicus in an important Alaska case (as well as the South Dakota matter). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
For a (rare) example in which one of these statutes comes up, see Davis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 39756 (WD KY, March 26, 2014), a Kentucky federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was denied religious services by being placed in segregation.In Davis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions:  all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 105712 (D SD, July 29. 2013), a South Dakota federal district court denied the South Dakota Department of Corrections motion to stay pending appeal to an injunction that was awarded requiring that it allow tobacco to be used in Native American rituals.In Field v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm by Kim Zetter
The exception comes from a 2011 Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Kim Zetter
Instead he made his ruling based solely on the "good faith" exception from a 2011 Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
 The case was then remanded to the trial court for further consideration.The relevant discussion is as follows:"¶22 The North Dakota Supreme Court in Carlson v. [read post]