Search for: "Davies v. North Dakota"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Davis, 261 S.W.3d 811, 815 (Tex. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
The state interest in settled rules is evidenced in the decision of 29 states to join Nevada’s brief, from Oregon and Alabama to Delaware and North Dakota. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
South Africa North West Premier Supra Mahumapelo has dismissed reports that he has withdrawn his defamation case against the North West Business Forum. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:28 am
Tillich v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
The Attorney General announced the Department of Justice’s commitment to the statute, the South Dakota class action filed by the Oglala Sioux Tribe is currently pending after much drama about whether Judge Davis was refusing to disclose evidence, and DOJ intervened as an amicus in an important Alaska case (as well as the South Dakota matter). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
For a (rare) example in which one of these statutes comes up, see Davis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
LEXIS 39756 (WD KY, March 26, 2014), a Kentucky federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was denied religious services by being placed in segregation.In Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:34 am
Davis (D. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions: all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
LEXIS 105712 (D SD, July 29. 2013), a South Dakota federal district court denied the South Dakota Department of Corrections motion to stay pending appeal to an injunction that was awarded requiring that it allow tobacco to be used in Native American rituals.In Field v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
The exception comes from a 2011 Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Instead he made his ruling based solely on the "good faith" exception from a 2011 Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm
The case was then remanded to the trial court for further consideration.The relevant discussion is as follows:"¶22 The North Dakota Supreme Court in Carlson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Arizona Gebhardt v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm
They are Alaska, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 507 P.2d 653, 660 (Cal. 1973). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
