Search for: "Davis v. Lucas" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
App’x 364, 366–67 (9th Cir. 2018) (considering personal contacts between the appellant and state of Washington to find personal jurisdiction to enforce a foreign arbitral award); S & Davis Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Parliamentarians, including former Brexit Secretary David Davis, former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Green MP Caroline Lucas and human rights organisations have called on the retail group owned by Mike Ashley to stop using facial recognition surveillance in their stores. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
After Jeremy’s review of Trade Secrets and Undisclosed Information last week here, Sam Davies of the International Chamber of Commerce informs Kat-readers that the ICC has just released a new publication entitled Trade Secrets: Tools for Innovation and Collaboration. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Students who see themselves as future experts on international arbitration might want to check out the autobiographical piece by Benjamin Davis and NaYoung Kim. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(UC Davis)Thompson Tim (Northwestern University)Tschoegl Adrian E. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
He did, however, strike out the defendant’s Lucas-Box meanings on the ground that “advancing Lucas-Box meanings that are at variance with the actual meaning found by the Court is wrong in principle”. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Jack Pringle
Lucas and Stubbs, 286 S.C. 98, 333 S.E.2d 781 (1985), under the Court’s “very limited scope of review” Justice Pleicones would have upheld the arbitrator’s award. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Jack Pringle
Lucas and Stubbs, 286 S.C. 98, 333 S.E.2d 781 (1985), under the Court’s “very limited scope of review” Justice Pleicones would have upheld the arbitrator’s award. [read post]