Search for: "Davis v Davis" Results 21 - 40 of 9,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2010, 1:00 am by Paul Caron
Wheeler (J.D. 2009, Pepperdine) has published Note, The Court Lends States a Break: Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Davis, (ED KY, Sept. 15, 2017), and Ermold v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:24 am by Daily Record Staff
Prior to trial, Davis moved to suppress evidence and to sever ... [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:05 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Voir dire — Sufficiency of evidence On June 2, 2021, a jury, sitting in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, convicted Robert Jamar Davis (“Appellant”) of (i) possession of a regulated firearm by a person convicted of a disqualifying crime, (ii) transporting a loaded handgun in a vehicle, (iii) carrying a […] The post ROBERT JAMAR DAVIS v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:11 pm by Shea Denning
The Davis Court also distinguished the Third Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:42 pm
" Today I am talking to Andrew Keogh, a barrister, published author and author of the White Rabbit blog about the case and the proposed anonymity legislation *** Listen to Podcast 67: Â R v Davis - Witness Anonymity with Andrew Keogh *** R v Davis [2008] Jack Straw's statement The Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 3 July 2008. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0746, 2012 MT 125, NIGEL and JAMI DAVIS, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
As such, I file my first report from the courtroom of Judge Beatrice Butchko, and State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:52 am by Daily Record Staff
” The State has moved to dismiss the appeal, on the grounds that the purported trial court errors alleged by Davis do not render his ... [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
  But, if the Court were unwilling to take that step (advocated in Davis v. [read post]