Search for: "Davis v. Action Mechanical" Results 21 - 40 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
” 3 KENNETH DAVIS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE, § 20.04 at 74 (1958); accord, Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Fenrich of Davis Polk & Wardwell presented the defense position. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
. ― The changes eliminate elements of the 2019 Nonbank Designation Guidance that incorporated and addressed certain holdings of the MetLife v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  Warner-Lambert had itself acquired in 1970 Parke-Davis, which had conducted research into pregabalin and a related compound gabapentin. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:15 am
"In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs cannot show that defendant Ferrante's failure to comply with a condition precedent under plaintiffs' contract was the cause of any loss (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]), since Ferrante did not prevent them from obtaining the same recovery at a later juncture. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]