Search for: "Davis v. Brooks Law Office"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 2:20 pm
Davis that will send the Dominion v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has published new guidance [PDF] “making it clear that FOI laws cover relevant information even when stored or sent on private accounts or devices“, reports Out-Law.com. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
It includes letters from Rebekah Brooks, James Murdoch, Tom Crone, Linklaters, Colin Myler and Neville Thurlbeck. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Parker was cleared of aiding and abetting a police officer to commit misconduct in a public office, but found guilty of handling a stolen mobile phone. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
Grappling withthe Meaning of "Testimonial", 71 Brook. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm
Here are some preliminary observations on the opinions in Michigan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
L. 1221-1253 (2011).Rice, Brooks V. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Similarly, Office Depot Inc. announced that it had "amended" its employment agreement with CEO Neil Austrian after Office Depot's recent merger with OfficeMax; the new agreement would provide Austrian with up to 650,000 shares of Office Depot's stock (currently trading at just over $4 per share). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Recent Cases: Davis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 12:49 pm
appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge: Wood v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Public accommodations operated by private businesses would not be integrated by law until the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act nearly a century later, which the Supreme Court subsequently upheld in Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8996, Davis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s holding that law-enforcement officers who stopped the petitioner from praying silently in her own home were entitled to qualified immunity because there was no prior case law involving similar facts conflicts with Hope v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 6:10 am
Julian Davis Mortenson harkened back to William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England to explain why the Supreme Court should stay far away from the Vesting Clause in the case. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Navarre, Director, Law Gravity LLC Reed S. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
Well, that’s kinda how it works, since the president gets to nominate federal judges during his term of office. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Davis (Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution) explore these issues and more. [read post]
