Search for: "Davis v. Clear et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am
Alexis Hunley et al v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
As a matter of full disclosure, Joondeph also served as a consultant for the State and Local Legal Center in the preparation of its amicus brief for the Government Finance Officers of America et al. [read post]
Tax Court of Canada Limits Shopping for Expert Witnesses: Aecon Construction Group Inc. v. The Queen
12 Jun 2012, 6:22 am
Davis et al. as reproduced by Justice O’Keefe of the Federal Court in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:20 pm
Information Commissioner et al [2015] UKUT 159. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
There have also been reports that the FTC is actively investigating violations of past merger consent decrees, potentially with the aim of unwinding the previously cleared merger.15 In this vein, the agencies have been issuing “close at your own risk” letters to merging parties in non-challenged and non-remedy transactions that remind the parties that the agencies retain the authority to challenge mergers after they have closed and that expiration of an HSR waiting period… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
Bigler et al. published in the May/June 1977 edition of the European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry). [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
Castro et al, 2:16-CV-00658-MCE-DB, 2018 WL 2329249, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
In Davis-Lynch Holding Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:04 am
Nintendo Co Ltd et al., 6-08-cv-00429(June 30, 2009, TXED Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
Aegis Development Company, L.L.C., et al. affirmed dismissal of claims pursuant to the subsequent purchaser doctrine, which provides that the right to sue for property damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner who owned the property at the time the damage occurred, unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
Aegis Development Company, L.L.C., et al. affirmed dismissal of claims pursuant to the subsequent purchaser doctrine, which provides that the right to sue for property damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner who owned the property at the time the damage occurred, unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
HOAs and the FHA Lau et al v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:08 pm
Nokia Corp. et al., 6-07-cv-00203 (TXED August 10, 2009, Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:09 am
Eduardo Vargas Reyes, et al. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:53 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, et al., 4-09-CV-03712 (S.D. [read post]
