Search for: "Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement"
Results 21 - 40
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
Together with our allies –we are right now enforcing powerful economic sanctions. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Those provisions, it concluded, include a requirement that state agencies bear the cost and burden of providing expert testimony to support placing Native children in foster care, a requirement that state agencies provide remedial services to Native families, and a requirement that state agencies maintain certain child-placement records. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Appellate Division, Third Department Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021) petitioner commenced a proceeding… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
” Around an hour and a half passed before law enforcement was alerted. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
Sanders v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
The court rejected the defendant’s invitation to overrule or limit to child victims its holding in State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am
Frank Iacovelli with respect to his alleged acts of child endangerment, child abuse or child molestation. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
Chapter 14 is limited in applicability to its own article and, consequently, does not apply to felony child abuse under G.S. 14-318.4 State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am
Davis, ___ N.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
It also was the date that the child support combined income cap pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act would have been adjusted. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
At the pre-discovery stage, this inference, though sparsely supported by the complaint, suffices. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
Davis, 126 N.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Limited-time matching gives ideological supporters extra incentive to contribute to a campaign they care about. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:42 am
Davis, 110 N.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
In support, he offers us the works of two respected military law theorists—Col. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
“The right to say ‘no’ to a union is just as important as the right to say ‘yes,’” said Mark Janus, an Illinois child support agency employee and the plaintiff in the case. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
Are the most patently farcical and protectionist restrictions nigh unchallengeable, or are there, in fact, judicially enforceable limits? [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In this regard, New York v. [read post]
