Search for: "Dawkins v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
Dawkins, 136 AD2d 726 [2d Dept 1988]). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
RT (Zimbabwe) and others (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 - read judgment It is no answer to a refugee claim to say that the individual concerned should avoid persecution by lying and feigning loyalty to a regime which he does not support. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
But it was a narrow majority (nine votes to eight) and a brief reading of the dissenting opinions gives pause for thought: does the slightly loony nature of a message justify its suppression? [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:47 am
Dawkins, 483 S.W.3d 1, 4 (Tex. 2016). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:51 am
AND CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Of course the opposition, though deadly, does not only emanate from the church. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Does television hold the key to better press regulation? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:05 am
Dawkins, 162 N.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Oct. 17, 2023) and Dawkins v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
Dawkins, 52 AD3d 826, 827). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
Dawkins, 52 AD3d 826, 827). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
” The Court does not question that S.T. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Dawkins & Ors. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full judgment in the libel case of McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors which was handed down on 30 March 2012 is now available ([2012] EWHC B3 (QB)). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
What was really going on and how does that get resolved? [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
Firstly, clause 4 effectively replicates the Reynolds defence on a statutory footing and some will question whether it does enough to protect public interest journalism. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
Francis FitzGibbon QC considers Professor Dawkins’s Jury Delusion Having seen off God, Professor Dawkins turns his attention to another object of veneration, the jury, in the The New Statesman. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Joshua Rozenberg, in his article in the Guardian, agrees, concluding that “If Sumption has anything to do with it – and now of course he does – the foreign secretary of the day will soon be held to account in much the same way as the Home Secretary is already. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
The Guardian’s Lisa O’Carroll quipped on Twitter: “Now Mail have published pap shots of Rebekah Brooks, does this mean Sun retaliates with pap pix of [Paul] Dacre in Caribbean? [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:41 pm
See also State v. [read post]
