Search for: "Dawkins v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
RT (Zimbabwe) and others (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 - read judgment It is no answer to a refugee claim to say that the individual concerned should avoid persecution by lying and feigning loyalty to a regime which he does not support. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
But it was a narrow majority (nine votes to eight) and a brief reading of the dissenting opinions gives pause for thought: does the slightly loony nature of a message justify its suppression? [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
So where does this judicial shyness and abstention come from? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
The Inner London FPC at Wells Street does not hold many fond memories for me – it was where I first found my feet (or lost them) as a baby-junior care practitioner and my abiding memory is of the dark waiting area on the ground floor. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Joshua Rozenberg, in his article in the Guardian, agrees, concluding that “If Sumption has anything to do with it – and now of course he does – the foreign secretary of the day will soon be held to account in much the same way as the Home Secretary is already. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
Firstly, clause 4 effectively replicates the Reynolds defence on a statutory footing and some will question whether it does enough to protect public interest journalism. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:46 am
Dawkins . [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full judgment in the libel case of McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors which was handed down on 30 March 2012 is now available ([2012] EWHC B3 (QB)). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Does the Minister [Ed Vaizey, culture minister] recognise that the proposals being put forward by Lord Hunt, chair of the Press Complaints Commission, fail to meet either of those tests? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
What was really going on and how does that get resolved? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
Hardy and Maile v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
Francis FitzGibbon QC considers Professor Dawkins’s Jury Delusion Having seen off God, Professor Dawkins turns his attention to another object of veneration, the jury, in the The New Statesman. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
” Swan Turton has a report here, as does PA Media Lawyer (subscription required). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
The Guardian’s Lisa O’Carroll quipped on Twitter: “Now Mail have published pap shots of Rebekah Brooks, does this mean Sun retaliates with pap pix of [Paul] Dacre in Caribbean? [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Does television hold the key to better press regulation? [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
Dawkins, 52 AD3d 826, 827). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
Dawkins, 52 AD3d 826, 827). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
At the Michigan View, Jeffrey Hadden previews next week’s oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am
Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene: what genes “want” to do is replicate. [read post]
