Search for: "Day v. Dept. of Rev." Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
[Klamm], 205 AD2d 459 [1st Dept 1994]; Broida v Bancroft, 103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]; Tosi v Pastene & Co., 34 AD2d 520 [1st Dept 1970]). [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
 259 A.D.2d 1004, 688 N.Y.S.2d 295 (4th Dept.1999). [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
For the latter reason, the applicants argue that the Order is not neutral and generally applicable for purposes of Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am by Orin Kerr
The day after my post, the judge in the case that prompted it ruled from the bench that the Fourth Amendment was not violated but did not address whether calling 911 is ordinarily a search. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
On January 24, 2022 — the day before the 15-day deadline but more than one month before the February 28, 2022 deadline— the IRC announced that it was deadlocked and, as a result, would not present a second plan to the legislature. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
On January 24, 2022 — the day before the 15-day deadline but more than one month before the February 28, 2022 deadline— the IRC announced that it was deadlocked and, as a result, would not present a second plan to the legislature. [read post]