Search for: "Day v. Saunders" Results 21 - 40 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
New York County Supreme Court Justice Verna Saunders refused to dismiss the Estate’s claims, finding that the settlement agreement and release did not extinguish the Estate’s rights as a shareholder upon Stile’s death. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Saini J will hear an assessment of damages in the case of Aslani v Sobierajska On 28 July 2021 Tipples J will hear the tr [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Saini J will hear the trial in Ashley v Times Newspapers. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm by John Floyd
    This problem was documented in a March 18, 2021 decision, Saunders v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
At a first ex-parte hearing, the injunction was granted, but at the return date, HHJ Saunders dismissed the injunction application. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:32 am by Tia Sewell
Coleman Saunders summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
” Drew Saunders Days III (Aug. 29, 1941 – Nov. 15, 2020) After growing up in the segregated South, Drew Days attended Yale Law School, worked as a civil rights lawyer alongside Martin Luther King, Jr., and eventually served as President Bill Clinton’s solicitor general from 1993 to 1996. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J handed down judgment after a meaning trial in the case of James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Lauren E. Quigley
The comment period on the proposed rule lasts sixty (60) days from when the NPRM is published in the federal register. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 4 November 2019 there will be an application in the case of James v Saunders. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At Real Clear Politics, David McDonald points to “the outlines of a consensus” in The American Legion v. [read post]