Search for: "Day v. State of Florida et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:55 pm
YOSEF DEITSCH, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:54 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
” * Jones v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Fla.), posted today: This action arises from an out-of-district subpoena directed to the Supervisor of Elections for Monroe County, Florida, issued in connection with US Dominion, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Bowie knives are back in constitutional law news these days, after a very long absence. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Zuckerberg et al.Decision Date: June 16, 2019 The United States District Court Northern District of California dismissed a First Amendment claim against Facebook. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
The Hydrogen Technology Corporation et al In the Southern District of New York, the SEC brought another civil action. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 12:38 pm
The Florida Department of Health, CDC, public health and regulatory officials in several other states, and the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
It seeks certification "on behalf of a class consisting of all immigrants who have been, or will in the future be, induced by Defendants to travel across state lines by fraud and misrepresentation" based on the indications that DeSantis et al intend to continue doing this sort of thing. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Treating Private Action Like State Action As I mentioned at the beginning, the Texas and Florida bills define “censorship” to mean an Internet service’s application of its editorial discretion to user content. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am
For example, the Bush v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 1:11 pm
Given the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Dobbs, there appeared to be no federal impediment to its enforcement; however, the day before the law was to go into effect, Leon County (Tallahassee) Circuit Judge John Cooper found in Planned Parenthood of Southwest & Central Florida et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:16 am
In Johnson, et al., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Mgmt Properties IV, LLC et al, 2022 WL 2079716, at *5 (S.D. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
After 19 days of public hearings producing a 10,000-page record, the Commission concluded that NEPA did not require the SEC to mandate such disclosures, and the courts later agreed.[7] While the SEC in the 1971 release had limited disclosure to “material matters,” in 1975 the Commission mandated disclosure of all environmental proceedings to which a government was a party, whether or not the amounts at issue were material. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am
Amalfi et al., and how the ruling may impact former President Trump should he run for president again. [read post]
