Search for: "Day v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 25,376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
In particular, we have to distinguish specific questions of original meaning from more general—and, here, more relevant—questions of original law: that is, the law of the United States as it stood at the Founding, and as it's been lawfully changed to the present day. [read post]
15 May 2024, 12:09 pm
United States (Bankruptcy Discharge; McGirt v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:43 am
This letter describes the United States’ findings and the steps the State can take to remedy the ADA violations we identify below. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not rule on the validity of the discovery rule, leaving the question for another day. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
Lab-cultivated products have won approval from the FDA and USDA in the United States, but some are waiting for a tougher review by EFSA. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
As a result, judges have provided two landmark opinions in the last 45 days in favor of web scrapers. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:59 am
Facts – This case (Patterson v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Also on the same day, there was a preliminary issues hearing in the case of Jeremy Vine v Joey Barton KB-2024-000733. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
United KingdomDirector of Public Prosecutions v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
United States that one cannot use the good-faith defense, especially when it’s based on an attorney’s counsel. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
On March 8, 2024, the same day that the rules w [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
