Search for: "De Witt v. De Witt" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Sedition is a serious charge, but a number of analysts (including Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes) have raised the possibility that certain conduct related to yesterday’s debacle might meet the terms of the statute. [read post]
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
We still await the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Uber v Aslam. [read post]
[iv] The explicit reference to Article IV of the WTO Agreement[v], Article XXIV of GATS[vi]  and Article VI:4 of GATS in the recitals to the Decision on Domestic Regulation makes clear the mandate of the CTS – to formulate the necessary disciplines on domestic regulation. [read post]
[v] The negotiating history of the SCM Agreement suggests that the focus of the SCM Agreement was on addressing trade-distorting subsidies offered by Members in their own ‘territories’. [read post]
The reasoning of the General Court equates de facto the application of State aid control to a mere conformity control on the application of domestic law by tax authorities. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf will testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Aug. 6 regarding the deployment of federal officers to Portland, Oregon. [read post]
(v)   Like many other US FTAs, the US-China trade deal establishes that there should be ‘criminal procedures and penalties’ available for ‘theft, fraud, physical or electronic intrusion and unauthorized or improper use of a computer system’ for trade secret misappropriation (Art. 1.8). [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am by Irene Marchioro (University of Bologna)
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
Instead, it is also about a persistent view of trade unions that predates the platform economy and efforts to avoid unionisation (as the extreme facts in United Steelworkers of America v Baron Metal Industries Inc illustrate). [read post]
More from our authors: European Public Law: The Achievement and the Brexit Challenge, Third Edition by Patrick J Birkinshaw€ 180 Global Trade and Customs Journal by € Common Market Law Review by € Journal of World Trade … [read post]
In 2007, researchers published findings in the scientific journal PNAS showing how local governments mitigated outbreaks of the 1918 flu pandemic by aggressively limiting public gatherings. [read post]