Search for: "DeBoer v. DeBoer" Results 21 - 40 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Not so with the DeBoer case; a case that has profound constitutional significance and that has become a symbol of the civil rights struggle of our time. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:58 pm by Richard M. Re
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Yates v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:12 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
In a 2-1 decision on Thursday, November 6, 2014, the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:51 am by The Federalist Society
On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Like in the Loving v Virginia decision from the 1960s -endorsing interracial marriages- the DeBoer case once again focuses the SCOTUS on whether certain rights, such as the right to select whom to marry, regardless of race or gender, are so fundamental that no state or federal law can interfere.The scheduled oral arguments at the end of April truly will be historic. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
  The Sixth Circuit’s decision upholding the discriminations in DeBoer v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:34 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Judge Piazza held that the 8th Circuit's decision pre-dated the seminal SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor.Arkansas' ban on same-sex marriage is also being challenged in federal court in the case of Jernigan v Crane; the federal judge in that case is currently considering AG McDaniel's motion for summary judgment.So the same-sex civil rights saga continues across the nation. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
The first is that just a month after the Supreme Court had seemingly dodged the issue for the rest of its 2014 Term, Judge Jeffrey Sutton’s decision in DeBoer v. [read post]