Search for: "Dears v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Taylor Gulatsi
Dear In Custodia Legis readers and Law Library of Congress patrons, colleagues, and friends: Aslihan Bulut. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm by Bryan West
” This, dear reader, is why tradespeople prefer commercial contracts to working for homeowners, and courts prefer litigants represented by counsel. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
California precedent currently allows California courts to enforce judgments of other tribunals (e.g., other states) even when those judgments enforce gambling debts. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It arises instead out of social traditions and institutions that prevent us from fully appreciating the implications of our actions and of the values that most of us already hold dear. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” By clearly stating that H&K is representing “you” – in this case, plaintiff – the document can reasonably create the impression that H&K was first and foremost representing plaintiff’s interests. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:21 am by Kurt R. Karst
  Further, FDA has utilized a variety of strategies to call attention to safety issues through Dear Doctor letters or other forms of communication, even if directing changes to labeling is difficult. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Indeed, Betsy came in the midst of the passing of Oklahoma version of state anti-immigrant law. [read post]
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]