Search for: "Deem v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 15,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm by Derek T. Muller
Each State may choose its presidential electors in the manner that the legislature deems appropriate.The State of Texas, in Texas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:08 am by Jeff Welty
The decision was based on the new interpretive approach announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:41 pm
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court in Kentuckly v, King, Docket No.09-1272, held that warrantless searches are valid so long as a police officer knocks loudly, announces themselves and hears evidence being destroyed. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by Kayla Campbell
  « Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:10 am by Shriram T. Eachambadi
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-3 on Thursday in Torres v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Richard Samp - Guest
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:59 am
R (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 464; [2008] WLR (D) 150 “The scope of the deeming provision in Sch 3, Pt 2, para 3(2) of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants etc) Act 2004, which required states listed in Sch 2, Pt 2, para 2 of the Act to be treated as countries safe for a person to be returned, was limited to the actual process of executive decision or adjudication of whether a person's removal… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:22 pm by Daily Record Staff
On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erroneously admitted certain testimony that appellant deems irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial, ... [read post]