Search for: "Def Business Entities" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of  Madden v Midland, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Banks have plenty of wiggle-room to adjust their business practices to changing regulatory realities.In short, the specters invoked by the industry are overblown. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Banks have plenty of wiggle-room to adjust their business practices to changing regulatory realities.In short, the specters invoked by the industry are overblown. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:50 am by Matthew Kahn
The Atlantic Council will host DEF CON to DC, a conversation on how policymakers can translate recommendations made at a series of cybersecurity conferences in Las Vegas this month into policy solutions. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
These NCT entities did not originate Plaintiffs' students loans; rather they acquired the loans after they were originated by another entity. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:22 pm by Matthew David Brozik
” So now we know, from reading the April 3 preliminary injunction signed by Judge Nathan, that “ABC” is really Michael Kors, L.L.C., and “DEF” is really… well, a small slew of defendants, including one corporation, two business entities of unclear constitution, five John Does, and twelve URLs. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:45 am by Daniel Shaviro
 This reflects both the types of income involved (much of it dividends and capital gains) and the tax rates of the partners (including tax-exempt entities and foreigners) that get allocated partnership income.There are many remaining questions, e.g., pertaining to whether the authors have correctly identified "business income," as opposed to investment income, as this might be relevant to how one thinks about the findings. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 4:40 am by Ben
 https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1693604/2015-03-24-order-re-defs-mtn-for-attys-fees.pdf [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm by Andrew Frisch
The Plaintiff’s employment with Defendant was dependent on Defendant’s financial savvy and business know-how to keep Defendant’s business financially sound so as to keep the doors open and afford Plaintiff the opportunity to work at Norma Jean’s Nightclub? [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
There is thus no requirement that a religious exemption “come[] packaged with benefits to secular entities. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:03 am by Matthew David Brozik
” So now we know, from reading the April 3 preliminary injunction signed by Judge Nathan, that “ABC” is really Michael Kors, L.L.C., and “DEF” is really… well, a small slew of defendants, including one corporation, two business entities of unclear constitution, five John Does, and twelve URLs. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
The chart is taken from an 8/24/12 post entitledThe Older You Are, The More Important You Consider The iPad To Be from the Business Insider's "Chart of the Day" series. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:52 am by Greenberg & Bederman
Our second example also involves the music business, but only peripherally. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
DePaul University College of Law Graeme Dinwoodie and Mark Janis: Welcome and Introduction Dinwoodie: boundaries are not a new issue, though more salient of late. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:11 am by Sheldon Toplitt
"  It remains to be seen whether subscribers, happy that the company wouldn't be split into two entities, will nonetheless absorb the higher $16 monthly subscription fee, which has not been rolled back. [read post]