Search for: "Defendant Doe 1"
Results 21 - 40
of 45,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2012, 6:11 am
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates, PLLC Defendant: John Does 1-8 Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement Court: Southern District of Indiana Judge: Judge Richard L. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:53 pm
Does 1-37, has severed as to all defendants except John Doe #1, and granted discovery as to John Doe #1.Report and recommendation severing as to John Does 2-11Order granting discovery as to John Doe #1 only[Ed. note. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:15 pm
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLC Defendant: John Does 1-16 Cause: Direct Infringement, Contributory Infringement Court: Northern District of Indiana Judge: Judge Joseph S. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLC Defendant: John Does 1-11 Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement Court: Northern District of Indiana Judge: Chief Judge Philip P. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
Does 1-4, the Court refused to accept joinder of the four John Does, and dismissed as to John Does 2-4:August 1, 2006, decision*In its decision, the Court also noted the requirement of producing concrete evidence of a prima facie case, and ordered the plaintiffs to produce copies of the copyright registrations allegedly infringed by John Doe number 1.After receiving plaintiffs' new papers, including the copyright registations, the… [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:02 am
Does 1-17, the case targeting George Washington University, defendant John Doe #3 has filed his response to the RIAA's response to the Order to Show Cause issued by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.Response to RIAA response** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->Slashdot this story! [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:00 am
Sex offenders […] The post What Does a Tier 1 Sex Offender In New Jersey Have to Do Going Forward? [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:46 am
Does 1-11, the RIAA says it needs more time to prepare its papers defending the order, and requests a 2-week extension of time.RIAA Motion for 2-week extension of time*Defendants' opposition to RIAA Motion for 2-week extension of time** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:p2pnet.net Slashdot It! [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:15 am
Here, the court that issued the order of protection did not have …The post Enhancement under U.S.S.G. 2A6.2(b)(1)(A) for “violation of a court order of protection” does not apply if the defendant was not served as required by law appeared first on Federal Defenders of New York Blog. [read post]
RIAA lawyers defend selves from Rule 11 accusations in University of Maine case, Arista v. Does 1-27
22 Apr 2008, 4:39 am
Does 1-27, one of the cases targeting students at the University of Maine, the RIAA lawyers have filed papers seeking to defend themselves from accusations of having violated Rule 11.They continue to argue that joinder of the John Does was appropriate, and cite older cases on that issue, mentioning none of the recent authorities to the contrary.RIAA opposition to Rule 11 motion** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary &… [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:57 pm
Does 1-4. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
Does 1-21, the defendant John Does have filed a reply brief responding the RIAA's supplemental opposition memo.Reply memorandum of law of "John Does"** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:10 pm
John Does 1-5 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01680-SEB-TABFile Date: Thursday, November 15, 2012Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:37 pm
John Does 1-4 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-01677-WTL-DMLFile Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2012Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
Defendant John Doe #4's Reply Memorandum of Law var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm
Does 1-45, the plaintiff has filed its papers responding to the motion to quash filed by pro se defendant Doe #8.Plaintiff's time to respond to a separate motion filed by defendant Doe #41 has not run yet.Plaintiff's memorandum of law responding to motion by defendant Doe #8 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:37 pm
Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER severing all defendants but Doe 1 entered. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:37 am
Does 1-11 Ray Beckerman, P.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 5:01 pm
The fair use defense does not apply if defendant’s use of plaintiff’s mark is likely to cause consumer confusion as to the origin of the goods or services offered. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Does 1-11, the District Court has granted the defendant John Doe #9's motion for severance, and severed as to Doe #9 and all other defendants except John Doe #1.District Judge Kathleen O'Malley rejected the RIAA's argument that severance was premature, agreed with the authorities that had granted severance, and dismissed the authorities cited by the RIAA as providing insufficient analysis, explanation, or… [read post]
