Search for: "Defendant Doe 1 Diocese"
Results 21 - 40
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2011, 9:22 pm
It does not -- not in the sense in which most people understand that word. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Roman Catholic Diocese of Lafayette, 2017 U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:34 pm
" After a brief introduction, he writes:1-the trial is "to protect" the assets of the independent diocese. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:41 pm
It does this by referring to the bizarre beginning of the address which the Presiding Bishop gave to the organizational meeting last January: In an unmistakable allusion to the South Carolina judicial system, she began by telling a story about a glider that got too close to a no-fly zone near a nuclear power plant in Darlington County. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:21 pm
The trial court then grants the plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law, concluding that there was no evidence that the plaintiff knew or should have known of the potential liability of the diocese by 1998: "Knowing a priest breached a duty does not, per se, tip off the reasonable person that the diocese had also breached a duty. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 5:40 am
Diocese Corp. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
Doe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
The only defendant named was the Episcopal Church (USA), and the lawsuit sought a declaratory judgment against it that the plaintiff Diocese and congregations were the sole owners of their respective names, registered marks (including the Diocese's traditional seal) and real properties. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
Later, after the rump group (“ECSC”) formed, it was added as a defendant, because it was calling itself the “Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:38 pm
They capitulated almost at once, and agreed to an injunction against their further misbehavior.But they were still the defendants in a suit against them alleging that they had engaged in wrongful behavior. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
TEC does not have an ultimate judicatory. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:41 pm
" (Read more about reckless infliction of emotional distress in the opinion on the case we filed against the Diocese of Nashville concerning its efforts to conceal the acts of a priest who had abused numerous boys, Doe 1 v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:54 am
” Doe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
It would have read (with emphasis added):SECTION 1. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
Harnish, No. 152 In a suit over the disposition of property claimed by a church which separated from its diocese, summary judgment for plaintiffs is affirmed where defendant-parish church held its real and personal property in trust for plaintiff-diocese, such that upon the parish's separation from the diocese its property reverted back to the diocese. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
The brief summary judgment order signed last Monday by Judge Chupp does not even begin to touch on the significance that lies behind it. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:58 pm
Gerns:1. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Like Justices Toal and Kittredge, and following Waccamaw, he thinks that the Dennis Canon does not, in and of itself, function to create a legally cognizable trust on parish property within the State of South Carolina. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
We learn:1. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:52 am
The court allowed the Diocese to cross-appeal to argue that the ministerial exemption is properly understood as a limit on the district court's adjudicative jurisdiction and that the 12(b)(1) should have been granted. [read post]
