Search for: "Delta Machinery" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s agricultural machinery patent inventive, clarifies law of… [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But if the headgear is likely to cause safety problems (for instance, because it might get caught in machinery) or the insignia are likely to cause undue controversy (presumably for reasons beyond just religious prejudice), the employer would be able to deny the accommodation.[2] Another possibility might be to borrow the "bona fide occupational qualification" doctrine from Title VII's disparate treatment law.[3] Under Title VII, employers can discriminate based on religion,… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   Global Global – General Why no one is reading this post (IP Think Tank) It’s the silly season but this is ridiculous (IP Think Tank) Year end wishes for 2010… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
  On July 29, 2006, a fire in plaintiff LeBaron's van damaged many of the tools and machinery plaintiff used in his business. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:09 am by Kevin Kaufman
There is an issue with including both a person’s consumption (C) and his or her change in net worth (ΔNW) in the tax base. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:53 am by Dan Carvajal
There is an issue with including both a person’s consumption (C) and his or her change in net worth (ΔNW) in the tax base. [read post]