Search for: "Denis Johnson"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2014, 9:24 am
Johnson & Johnson, et al., they were unsuccessful, at least as far as 650 plaintiff cases were concerned. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:08 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court denied rehearing in a matter where the court had recently ordered a one-year suspension. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 6:51 am
On the other hand, the plaintiffs’ lawyers have asked the judge to deny Johnson & Johnson’s request, arguing their expert witnesses are qualified and rely on sound methodologies to reach their opinions. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:08 am
Johnson (Texas), Horse Losses and Other Pleasures, 142 Tax Notes 443 (Apr. 1, 2014): Current law denies the deduction of losses from equestrian and other such activities if not undertaken for profit. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 8:23 am
Marcia Johnson (Texas Southern) has posted Will the Current Economic Crisis Fuel a Return to Racial Policies that Deny Homeownership Opportunity and Wealth to African Americans? [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:10 pm
Plenty of articles regarding whether to repeal or relax the Johnson Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
The plaintiffs’ attorneys naturally deny these allegations. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:54 pm
Circuit was denied by the afternoon. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:48 am
Tens of thousands of other plaintiffs have filed suit with similar claims, which Johnson & Johnson continues to deny. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:58 am
The SCOTUS denied Sarah Johnson's cert petition in Johnson v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:52 pm
Without admitting or denying the findings, Johnson, a previous advisor with SunTrust Investment Services and DH Hill Securities, consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he borrowed $528,000 from a customer, but failed to notify or obtain written approval of the loan in advance from his member firm. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm
” In addition, the Associated Press reports that a consultant to Johnson and Johnson wrote a memo to the company equating the risks of using their baby and body powders with the risks of getting cancer from smoking cigarettes stating “to ignore such risks would be denying the obvious in the face of all evidence to the contrary”. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
State, this Court considered whether the Circuit Court for Montgomery County erred in denying Casey Johnson’s motion to suppress evidence that police seized pursuant to a warrantless search of the trunk of her car during a traffic stop. 232 Md. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:59 pm
Despite having lost most talc powder cases, Johnson and Johnson is still denying their talc powder is unsafe. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:04 pm
Stearns in Massachusetts denied Johnson and Johnson’s motion to reconsider his February 25 order denying him relief from one qui tam suit on grounds of the False Claims Act’s first-to-file rule (Judge Stearns did dismiss another relator, however, for that reason). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
A woman in Virginia has just been awarded $110.5 million in a Johnson & Johnson talcum powder lawsuit. [read post]
21 May 2020, 11:33 am
Johnsons & Johnson always denied the claims and announced in a statement yesterday that its decision to remove the talc baby powder from the market was based on a decline in sale that was due to changing consumer habits and a misinformation campaign about the safety of the product. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 12:15 am
The American Red Cross (ARC) expressed outrage earlier this week that Johnson & Johnson (J&J) was suing ARC for trademark infringement. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:35 am
Fortunately for the plaintiffs, who have yet to have their day in court, the judge hearing the motion denied Johnson & Johnson’s request. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:41 pm
Because we hold that Johnson did not establish a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, we deny Rivero's application.The majority disagreed with the Seventh Circuit:We acknowledge that one of our sister circuits has held that Johnson applies retroactively to decisions on collateral review, but we are unpersuaded by that decision. [read post]
