Search for: "Dennis Jacobs v." Results 21 - 40 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 21 November 2019, Steyn J heard an application in the case of UUU v BBB. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato merits brief in Supreme Court case of Espinosa v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Jacob Rowbottom and Richard Wingfield. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:37 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There was also a slight bi-partisan divide in the Second Circuit when it issued Zarda: one conservative judge, Dennis Jacobs, sided with the plaintiffs in that case. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
Walters, Judge Dennis Jacobs points out “egregious” FBI leaks and “notices the irony that Walters and the FBI agent both apparently misused confidential information, but that only one of them is going to jail. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:34 am by Scott Bomboy
In his dissent, Judge Dennis Jacobs said the case needed to be decided under another Second Circuit precedent, Loce v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of July, two thousand eighteen.PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,REENA RAGGI,PETER W. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:42 am by Barry Barnett
Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs wrote the opinion for the largely 3-0 panel. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm by Michael Knapp
  Judge Dennis Jacobs asked whether magistrates should impose use restrictions on the evidence collected. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs dissented, arguing that Apple did not violate the antitrust law when judged by either a “per se” standard or a “rule of reason” analysis. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Jacobs, 117 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1997) (holding that intent to harm is, in fact, an element of the offense); United States v. [read post]