Search for: "Dent v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:24 pm by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Those events generally have not put a dent in the death penalty.The first, the Spanish flu (H1N1), wreaked havoc in the United States from 1918-1920. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
On the contrary, it provides that ‘[e]xcept when express provision therefor is made either in a statute of the United States or in these rules,’ the cost-shifting to the prevailing party otherwise applies to all cases. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:22 am
The Act also vests the Presi- dent with authority to restrict the entry of aliens whenever he finds that their entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am by Mark Walsh
The chief justice (of the United States, that is), then announces that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion of the court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]