Search for: "Department of Industrial Relations v. Estes"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
Please note that on Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 11:00 AM EST, my colleague Marissa Streckfus and I will be conducting a free, hour-long webinar in which we will discuss The Top Ten D&O Stories of 2021. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 7788 Santa Rosa, CA 95407-0788 Phone: (707) 566-8647 Fax: (707) 586-3279 E-mail: ucpnb@sonic.net UCP of the Golden Gate 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 832-7430 Fax: (510) 839-1329 E-mail: info@ucpgg.org Web: http://www.ucpgg.org UCP of Stanislaus County 1213 13th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 577-2122 Fax: (209) 577-2392 E-mail: rlonczak@yahoo.com CALIFORNIA STATE RESOURCES AGING The California Association of Area Agencies on Aging (C4A) 980 Ninth Street,… [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
The report also highlights many recommendations for congressional and executive branch action, including to: --Increase the capacity of the FBI and State Department to address transnational repression and PRC efforts to intimidate and silence Uyghurs, Hong Kongers, Tibetans, and members of the Chinese-American diaspora;--Sanction individuals responsible for forced labor and extend sanctions authorities for PRC officials complicit in forced sterilizations and forced abortions in the… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Ultimately, by the 19th century, the slow, relatively stable and case based structures of common law/equity started to experience substantial stress in the face of the Enlightenment’s emphasis on the science of management (of people and things) and the realities of the Industrial Revolution. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
For example, in February 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, applying New York law, reversed a lower court’s rejection of the disclosure-only settlement of a suit that had been filed in connection with Verizon’s proposed acquisition of Vodafone subsidiaries holding ownership interests in Verizon Wireless, as discussed here. [read post]
