Search for: "Department of Transportation v. Land"
Results 21 - 40
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
Surface Transportation Bd., Norfolk Southern petitioned for review of an order by the Surface Transportation Board (successor to the Interstate Commerce Commission) concerning the Belt Line. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:20 am
[iv] PCSF Agency Expansion The PCSF expanded in November 2022,[v] adding four new partner agencies: (1) the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Energy; (2) the Department of the Interior; (3) the Department of Transportation; and (4) the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
[iv] PCSF Agency Expansion The PCSF expanded in November 2022,[v] adding four new partner agencies: (1) the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Energy; (2) the Department of the Interior; (3) the Department of Transportation; and (4) the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm
Last month, in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am
”[7] The Fifth Circuit noted that even though the SRA-L was made part of the umbrella of the executive branch via its placement in the Department of Transportation and Development after its creation, it maintained substantial control over its operations. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
(Refugees often enter the country using State Department issued transportation letters or boarding foils, which are not technically visas, and asylees are authorized to live and work in the United States by immigration judges or the Department of Homeland Security, not generally through visas). [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
Permits are issued by local police departments. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Administrative Procedure Act; Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974) United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
On Wednesday 19th and Thursday 20th April the Court will hear the case of Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and others, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 651. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
City of Los Angeles (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 657 In 2010, the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP”), and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Board of Commissioners (collectively, “Los Angeles”) approved a set of substantively identical leases (2010 Leases) governing about 6,100 acres of land Los Angeles owns in Mono County. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Melling pointed to cases such as Fulton v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Department of Transportation, 946 A.2d 1123 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2006), to hold that PennDOT should only be immune from suit in guide rail claims in limited circumstances. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
Book V: Economic Development This provision includes the norms, rules, and laws concerning the capacity of municipal governments to sponsor, promote, and market the establishment of businesses and industries. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:28 pm
In January of 2012, the New York State Department of Transportation seized 27,041 square feet of the northern side of the property, leaving 12,859 square feet to the landowner. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
He said he had landed deals to fix decrepit power plants and finance the development of wind and solar energy. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:32 pm
The trial court held that, according to the Michigan Department of Transportation’s (MDOT) Bureau of Aeronautics survey, there was an encroachment of the APA under federal regulations. [read post]
